As with most prior major disputes between powerful industry interests, some compromise will be reached that allows mobile operators to bond LTE capacity with available Wi-Fi resources, even if powerful Wi-Fi interests would prefer such access be barred.
The reason for optimism is that as a matter of law, some protocols for Wi-Fi sharing, such as LTE-U, cannot lawfully be barred in the U.S. market, even if matters are different in other markets, where a “listen before talk” protocol is mandatory.
In those other markets, there arguably is even less truth to the notion that allowing LTE devices access to Wi-Fi, on the same basis as other Wi-Fi networks and devices, would be unusually harmful, beyond the simple observation that the number of devices contending for access is increased.
Opponents of LTE-U say high use of LTE-U on any single Wi-Fi site degrades overall throughput. The issue is that high usage degrades any single Wi-Fi location. So it is difficult to separate the impact of higher loading from the specific impact of LTE-U devices.
No comments:
Post a Comment