Satellite industry and fixed wireless executives oppose reallocation of some C-band spectrum between 3.4 and 4.2 GHz from fixed satellite and fixed wireless to mobile use, in most cases even when mobile industry advocates suggest existing C-band licensees will be protected where they have operations.
As proposed by some mobile industry executives, C-band spectrum would be especially in urban areas, to support operation of small cells.
From a satellite industry perspective, losing any capacity to mobile is important because it is viewed as a precedent that eventually could lead to loss of even more potential satellite spectrum.
Mobile interests of course emphasize the value of shared use in those bands, representing a maximum of 320 MHz of new capacity in the city of London, for example.
“Avoided cost” drives sizable financial benefits, a study conducted for the GSMA by Plum Consulting suggests.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is Sora an "iPhone Moment?"
Sora is OpenAI’s new cutting-edge and possibly disruptive AI model that can generate realistic videos based on textual descriptions. Perhap...
-
NTT researchers recently demonstrated ability to transmit 100 Gbps at 300 GHz frequencies, far beyond the ranges we have used for freespa...
-
It is possible 6G networks will be fundamentally different from 5G in ways beyond use of spectrum, faster speeds and even lower latency. 6G ...
-
The general consensus now seems to be that 5G will be adopted about as fast as 4G. That said, one might argue that adoption curves for 2G an...
No comments:
Post a Comment